Economic and Environmental Analysis

The Center for Sustainable Economy provides expertise in the areas of economic and environmental analysis. Our economists help expose the true costs associated with both public and private sector decisions to deplete natural capital, exacerbate sprawl, and make decisions that increase inequality in our society. Conversely, we document the true benefits associated with protection of natural areas, local self reliance, affordable housing, and other sustainable policies. Because many of these benefits and costs are not experienced as market transactions, we employ a range of techniques for assessing non-market impacts in addition to more traditional techniques such as regional modeling that consider effects on jobs and income.

CSE works with biologists, environmental planners, hydrologists, and geographic information specialists to document the direct, indirect, and cumulative environmental impacts of intensive land uses such as logging, grazing, mining, oil and gas leasing, road building, and urban development. We also work with counties, cities, and businesses to calculate and identify measures they can take to reduce their ecological footprint.

Recent examples of our economic and environmental analyses include:

08/03/07
Category: Analysis
Posted by: Suntara

Fort Huachuca and the San Pedro River: Improving Water Deficit Liability Calculations Through Economic Modeling.

Arizona’s San Pedro River is one of the nation’s hotspots of biological diversity, providing critical habitat for over 350 species of birds, 80 mammals, two native and several introduced species of fish, and more than 40 species of amphibians and reptiles Groundwater pumping jeopardizes the health of the river, and Ft. Huachuca is by far the biggest culprit. CSE completed a study for the Center for Biologcial Diversity that points out serious shortcomings of Ft. Huachuca’s population-based method for establishing its groundwater deficit liability and responsibility for mitigation. While Ft. Huachuca claims its liability may be as low as 35%, economic modeling suggests its liability is more likely to be in the range of 80%. Read:

 

Full Report

03/15/07
Category: Analysis
Posted by: Suntara
Carbon Footprint Analysis of the Delong Mountain Terminal Project (DMTP). The DMTP has the potential to increase carbon emissions associated with construction activities, shipping, fuel used at the mine, and fuel consumed by regional villages. This report discusses the legal basis for disclosing this carbon footprint increase. We then identify the magnitude of economic damages or social costs associated with this increase, the carbon sequestration spatial biocapacity required to absorb the increase (footprint), and the overall carbon intensity (carbon footprint per $ of economic activity) of the DMTP.  Read:

01/25/07
Category: Analysis
Posted by: Suntara

Benefit-Cost Analysis of the Delong Mountain Terminal Project: Critique and Independent Assessment of Key Parameters.

On the far northwestern arctic coast of Alaska, the Army Corp of Engineers and the Alaska Industrial Export Authority are pursuing a plan for major expansion of the Delong Mountain port to accommodate deep draft vessels servicing the Red Dog lead mine and to increase imports of oil from Singapore. The plan jeopardizes subsistence use by nearby residents of the Alaska village of Kivalina and sensitive marine mammal habitat. Working with the Northern Alaska Environmental Center, CSE has completed a critique of the Corps benefit-cost analysis and a reassessment that takes into account carbon emissions damage, loss of subsistence use, loss of marine mammal habitat and other non-market costs as well as more realistic assumptions regarding fuel prices.  The assessment has determined that costs may exceed benefits by a factor of five.  Read:

 Full Report   Talberth Declaration

12/20/06
Category: Analysis
Posted by: admin

Fishprint of Nations 2006 trends and recommendations for our oceans. CSE, in conjunction with Redefining Progress and The Ocean Project, has released The Fishprint of Nations 2006, a comprehensive analysis of humanity’s current and projected impact on the Earth’s marine ecosystems.  The study, adapted from the popular Ecological Footprint analysis tool, found that present levels of seafood consumption are dangerously unsustainable. The global catch of seafood is roughly 157% over sustainable yield levels.  The report details the need for protected marine areas and a reworking of our seafood consumption habits in order to avoid widespread fisheries collapse in the next half century.  Read:

Press Release  Full Report  Environmental News Service Story

12/20/06
Category: Analysis
Posted by: admin

Economic and Community Benefits of Protecting New Mexico's Inventoried Roadless Areas. CSE estimates that New Mexico's inventoried roadless areas on national forest lands generate tens of millions of dollars in economic benefits each year in the form of carbon sequestration, water filtration, backcountry recreation, game and non-game wildlife habitat, and scenery. We also found that counties with significant concentrations of roadless areas outperformed counties without by an average of 1.28% across four key economic performance measures. Prepared for Forest Guardians, Santa Fe. Read:

Press Release  Executive Summary  Full Report

12/20/06
Category: Analysis
Posted by: admin

Carbon Footprint Analysis for Kaiser Permanente Food Procurement Alternatives in Northern California. CSE (formerly Ecology and Law Institute) worked with Community Alliance with Family Farmers to develop then analyze the environmental benefits of a local food procurement program for a system of 19 hospitals managed by Kaiser Permanente in northern California. CSE's analysis demonstrated that modest measures to substitute fruits and vegetables grown by California farmers for foods imported from Mexico, South, and Central America could reduce the carbon footprint associated with foods procured for Kaiser's hospitals by 20%. Read:

Full Report  San Francisco Chronicle Story